Meanwhile, there is no answer on the status of payments of the periods 1994-2007 because - they say

PISTOIA. In February, the Provincial Councillor Patrick Stone had tabled a question asking to know in detail the status of the payment of Bim (surcharges river catchments Montani) for attingimento and water use for the production of electricity. The proceeds were supposed to end up in the coffers of the Montana and then in mountain towns.
Meanwhile, there is no answer on the status of payments of the periods 1994-2007 because - they say - prescribed. The Stone And here arises the first question: is it true that everything is prescribed, but in the event that the surcharges were never paid, there will be a possibility for the case of loss of revenue for the defunct Mountain ufi filters spa Community and then the whole mountain people?
Second, given that it seems that only the council Ceccarelli has addressed the issue of Bim in the Mountain Community before the closing of the Body, as to avoid burdening previous administrations - those, ufi filters spa for instance, ufi filters spa the shortage ... - the political responsibilities of omission so obvious relief?
But read the considerations of La Pietra, which follows the response of the President Fratoni and - last and to refresh the memories of readers - the same question of the Director of the PDL.
The curious case of Anghiari Bim associated with the company, which also appears to be the only one in the 31/12/12 to have fully paid their debt, in which the response reads: "From the survey conducted on the status of payments shows that with the 'Annuity 2012 was also requested amount reported in the years 2010 and 2011. "
Finally, Bim of Pistoia mountains, which amounted to approximately 642,000, have not yet been collected since the companies have made almost all of the complaints are based on a variety of reasons, which do not enter into the merits, but that show, in my view, a framework is extremely complex and confusing especially the question of how Bim has been treated in the former Mountain Community.
But this response, as well as precise indications of the figures that relate to the Bim that the former Mountain Community must collect, or collected by manufacturers of electricity, there are two elements, in my opinion, important for the overall interpretation of the story. The first element is read verbatim in response: "As for the years beyond 1994, and prior to 2007 is not going no verification for non-collectability any extra fees." ufi filters spa
In practice, it is said that it is useless to establish the amount of digits due prior to 2007 because the whole is unreasonable, as they are after the deadlines for the request. True. The answer is not politically correct but institutionally. The problem, in fact, is whether these fees were never requested. If you have never collected, by whom and what was done? This is not a problem only administrative.
To these questions is due to a response, clarity and fairness, in respect of nationals of the mountain. I do not think it is correct to avoid a complete response hiding behind a norm. Even so, if this is not done, I say if this could perhaps assume a loss of revenue'' s body. I hope that soon we can have on this answers. The second item You always reads verbatim response: "It has also been conducted on the address of the Council of the former Mountain Community, a special audit in accordance with the terms of the ordinary five-year limitation period for which they were taken into account only the years 2007/2012."
Then came, in response, that in the early months of 2012, the junta headed by Ceccarelli makes a decision to shed light on the structure ufi filters spa of these Bim asking to do a survey ufi filters spa on the last 5 years. This may legitimately lead you to think that until that moment there was no document that would clarify the issue.
It is therefore necessary to break a lance in favor of the Council chaired by Ceccarelli, it seems, as things stand, however, the only one to have issued an order for the purpose of clarity.
From 1994 to 2007 have been applied for the Bim extra fees? If the answer is no, why? Whose responsibility is it? Questions to the policy in the first place must give an answer and do not let that citizens are forced to form committees ufi filters spa for other legitimate purposes.
Dear Counsellor, regarding your question on the assessment of the extra fees for catchments Montani (hereinafter referred to as BIC), with the answer to this are as listed below, also availing of the statements drawn up by the Executive ufi filters spa Unit for project management of agricultural land and forest